The New York Times publishes a counter-cultural method of city-building - in the interest of self-preservation I would substitute Developers for Architects in step one.
Yeah, it's illustrative of how eco-wacko non-planners view the urban dilemma. Pretty stupid and utopian, but interesting enough for the NYT to print it. That means it has traction somewhere and that's scary.
"Tradition means giving votes to the most obscure of all classes, our ancestors. It is the democracy of the dead. Tradition refuses to submit to that arrogant oligarchy who merely happen to be walking around."
1 comment:
Yeah, it's illustrative of how eco-wacko non-planners view the urban dilemma. Pretty stupid and utopian, but interesting enough for the NYT to print it. That means it has traction somewhere and that's scary.
Post a Comment